(SOLVED) Week 6 iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter – Neurologic Assessment Reflection Worksheet for Emily Green – Headache

Rubric

W6 iHuman Rubric
W6 iHuman Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Focused Health History

Complete a focused health history (scores are automatically calculated within the iHuman platform)

20 pts

Excellent
Achieve a score of 90-100%.

18 pts

Very Good
Achieve a score of 80-89%.

16 pts

Satisfactory
Achieve a score of 70-79%.

10 pts

Needs Improvement
Achieve a score of 50-69%.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Achieve a score of 0-49%.
20 pts

Focused Physical Exam

Complete a focused physical exam (scores are automatically calculated within the iHuman platform

20 pts

Excellent
Achieve a score of 90-100%.

18 pts

Very Good
Achieve a score of 80-89%.

16 pts

Satisfactory
Achieve a score of 70-79%.

10 pts

Needs Improvement
Achieve a score of 50-69%.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Achieve a score of 0-49%.
20 pts

EMR Documentation- Subjective data 5 Required Criteria

Document the history of present illness (HPI) and focused review of systems (ROS). Documentation must be:

1. accurate

2. detailed

3. written using professional terminology

4. pertinent to the chief complaint

5. include subjective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good
4 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory
3 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts

EHR Documentation – Objective data 5 Required Criteria

Document physical exam findings. Documentation must be:

1. accurate

2. detailed

3. written using professional terminology

4. pertinent to the chief complaint

5. include objective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good
4 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory
3 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts

Key Findings/Most Significant Active Problem

Identify the most significant active problem (MSAP)

5 pts

Excellent
Identifies the most significant active problem (MSAP).

4.5 pts

Very Good
Identifies the expert-identified MSAP as a related problem.

4 pts

Satisfactory
Identifies the expert-identified MSAP as an unrelated problem.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Does not identify the MSAP.
5 pts

Problem Statement 4 Required Criteria

Document a brief, accurate problem statement using professional language. Include the following components:

1. name or initials, age

2. chief complaint

3. positive and negative subjective findings

4. positive and negative objective findings

5 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

4.5 pts

Very Good
3 requirements met.

4 pts

Satisfactory
2 requirements met.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement
1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
5 pts

Management Plan 6 Required Criteria

Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent comprehensive evidence-based management plan. If a specific component of the management plan is not warranted (i.e., no referrals are appropriate for the virtual patient) document that no intervention is warranted. Include the following components:

1. diagnostic tests

2. medications: write a specific prescription for each medication, including over-the-counter medications

3. suggested consults/referrals

4. client education

5. follow-up, including time interval and specific symptomatology to prompt a sooner return

6. Provide rationales for each intervention and cite at least one relevant scholarly source as defined by program expectations

15 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

14 pts

Very Good
5 requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory
4 requirements met.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
15 pts

Reflection 4 Required Criteria

Address the following question: What are the “red flags” in this case? Based on your pertinent key findings, what is “the worst-case scenario”? What lessons did you learn from this case that you can apply to your future professional practice? Include the following components:

1. write 150-300 words in a Microsoft Word document

2. demonstrate clinical judgment appropriate to the virtual patient scenario

3. cite at least one relevant scholarly source as defined by program expectations

4. communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

10 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good
3 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory
2 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement
1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts

Formatting

Use current APA format for citations and references in management plan and reflection and is free of errors.

5 pts

Excellent
0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good
2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory
4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement
6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors.
5 pts

Late penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

0 pts

a. Full credit
On Time

0 pts

b. -10 points
1 day late

0 pts

c. -20 points
2 days late

0 pts

d. -30 points
3 days late

0 pts

e. No credit
More than three (3) days late
0 pts
Total Points: 100
Shopping Cart (0 items)