(SOLVED) Week 5: iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter – Abdominal Assessment for Roger Miller

Rubric

NR509 Wk 5 iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter Rubric
NR509 Wk 5 iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Focused Health History

Complete a focused health history (scores are automatically calculated within the iHuman platform)

20 pts

Excellent
Achieve a score of 90-100%.

18 pts

Very Good
Achieve a score of 80-89%.

16 pts

Satisfactory
Achieve a score of 70-79%.

10 pts

Needs Improvement
Achieve a score of 50-69%.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Achieve a score of 0-49%.
20 pts
Focused Physical Exam

Complete a focused physical exam (scores are automatically calculated within the iHuman platform

20 pts

Excellent
Achieve a score of 90-100%.

18 pts

Very Good
Achieve a score of 80-89%.

16 pts

Satisfactory
Achieve a score of 70-79%.

10 pts

Needs Improvement
Achieve a score of 50-69%.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Achieve a score of 0-49%.
20 pts
EMR Documentation- Subjective data 5 Required Criteria

Document the history of present illness (HPI) and focused review of systems (ROS). Documentation must be:

1. accurate

2. detailed

3. written using professional terminology

4. pertinent to the chief complaint

5. include subjective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good
4 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory
3 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts
EHR Documentation – Objective data 5 Required Criteria

Document physical exam findings. Documentation must be:

1. accurate

2. detailed

3. written using professional terminology

4. pertinent to the chief complaint

5. include objective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good
4 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory
3 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts
Key Findings/Most Significant Active Problem

Identify the most significant active problem (MSAP)

5 pts

Excellent
Identifies the most significant active problem (MSAP).

4.5 pts

Very Good
Identifies the expert-identified MSAP as a related problem.

4 pts

Satisfactory
Identifies the expert-identified MSAP as an unrelated problem.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Does not identify the MSAP.
5 pts
Problem Statement 4 Required Criteria

Document a brief, accurate problem statement using professional language. Include the following components:

1. name or initials, age

2. chief complaint

3. positive and negative subjective findings

4. positive and negative objective findings

5 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

4.5 pts

Very Good
3 requirements met.

4 pts

Satisfactory
2 requirements met.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement
1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
5 pts
Management Plan 6 Required Criteria

Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent comprehensive evidence-based management plan. If a specific component of the management plan is not warranted (i.e., no referrals are appropriate for the virtual patient) document that no intervention is warranted. Include the following components:

1. diagnostic tests

2. medications: write a specific prescription for each medication, including over-the-counter medications

3. suggested consults/referrals

4. client education

5. follow-up, including time interval and specific symptomatology to prompt a sooner return

6. Provide rationales for each intervention and cite at least one relevant scholarly source as defined by program expectations

15 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

14 pts

Very Good
5 requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory
4 requirements met.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
15 pts
Reflection 4 Required Criteria

Address the following question: Some clinicians may find it difficult to explain the logic behind their clinical thinking. As you gain experience, your clinical reasoning will begin at the outset of the patient encounter, not at the end. Reflect on the clinical reasoning you used during this virtual patient encounter. Describe the steps taken to identify and interpret the key findings in this case. What are some “lessons learned” within the assessment that you can apply to your professional practice as a provider? Include the following components:

1. write 150-300 words in a Microsoft Word document

2. demonstrate clinical judgment appropriate to the virtual patient scenario

3. cite at least one relevant scholarly source as defined by program expectations

4. communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

10 pts

Excellent
All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good
3 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory
2 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement
1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts
Formatting

Use current APA format for citations and references in management plan and reflection and is free of errors.

5 pts

Excellent
0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good
2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory
4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement
6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors.
5 pts
Late Penalty Deduction

0 pts

a. Full credit
On time

0 pts

b. -10 points
1 day late

0 pts

c. -20
2 days late

0 pts

d. -30
3 days late

0 pts

e. More than three (3) days late
No credit.
0 pts
Total Points: 100
Shopping Cart (0 items)